Mr C Walton v Eestairs UK Ltd — 2025

Case reference: 6009274/2024
Decision date: 29 April 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer. The

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr C Walton

Respondent

Eestairs UK Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal struck out the claim under Employment Tribunal Rules 38(1)(c) and (d) because the Claimant was in breach of a Tribunal Order and had not actively pursued the case.

A strike-out warning had been issued on 29 April 2025 by EJ Fredericks-Bowyer. The Claimant did not respond to that warning and had still not complied with Employment Judge Burge's Order dated 9 January 2025 or actively pursued the claim, so the Tribunal considered strike-out to be in accordance with the overriding objective.

The preliminary hearing listed for 23 September 2025 and the final hearing listed for 14 to 16 September 2026 were vacated.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The judgment is a short strike-out decision and does not separately analyse this claim type.	Struck out	—	—
Whistleblowing	The judgment is a short strike-out decision and does not separately analyse this claim type.	Struck out	—	—
Unfair dismissal	The judgment is a short strike-out decision and does not separately analyse this claim type.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.