Case 6009282/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ranjit Singh (also known as Mr Sahota) v Bramfitt Technology Labs Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009282/2024
- Decision date
- 17 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ranjit Singh (also known as Mr Sahota)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant applied on 17 December 2025 for reconsideration of a judgment given the same day. The Tribunal found that the application was made in writing on the day of the oral judgment and complied with Rule 69.
The claimant argued that the hearing proceeded despite an outstanding strike-out application, unresolved accessibility and reasonable-adjustment issues, and late or non-compliant disclosure. The Tribunal found that those issues had been considered at the outset of the hearing, that the hearing was adjourned to allow consideration of the applications and bundle, and that adjustments were made including a large-font bundle, additional document review, printing enlarged documents, recalling the claimant for further evidence-in-chief, and postponing re-examination.
The Tribunal refused the request to review the full digital audio recording and rejected the bias and recusal points as unsupported beyond disagreement with case-management decisions. It concluded that the grounds did not disclose a basis to revoke or vary the judgment and refused the reconsideration application.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment concerns refusal of the claimant's reconsideration application. The extracted text does not state the original merits outcome or any remedy for the underlying disability discrimination claim. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 69 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 70(1) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 70(2) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 72(1) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.