Case 6009320/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Wilson v Lambert Print & Design Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009320/2025
- Decision date
- 27 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented on 18 March 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
Lambert Print & Design Limited was substituted as the correctly named respondent under rule 35. The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,538.42, and that the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement of £2,796.58 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time and the Employment Judge made a rule 22 determination. | Upheld | — | £5,538 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £2,797 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,335
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
- rule 35
- Rule 89
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.