Case 6009331/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Bowmaker v Sharpsmart Limited HELD AT: CVP — 2024
- Case reference
- 6009331/2024
- Decision date
- 29 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Booth REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Bowmaker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting by Employment Judge Booth at a CVP hearing on 29 November 2024, determined two claims brought by Mr J Bowmaker against Sharpsmart Limited. The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages contrary to Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was found not well-founded and dismissed.
The tribunal also found that the breach of contract complaint was not well-founded and dismissed it. The judgment does not set out a separate monetary remedy because no claim succeeded.
The respondent's application for costs was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment described this as a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages contrary to Part II Employment Rights Act 1996 and found it was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment recorded a breach of contract complaint and found it was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.