Case 6009366/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Marcinkevicius v Mars Petcare UK — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009366/2024
- Decision date
- 22 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Marcinkevicius
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Midlands East Employment Tribunal on 23 August 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Victoria Butler decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The judgment records that the claim succeeds. No substantive findings on liability are set out in the extracted text beyond the rule 22 determination, and the remedy was left to be decided at a later Remedy Hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action(s). It records that the respondent failed to present a valid response on time, that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure, and that the claim succeeds with remedy to be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.