Case 6009381/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Nicholson v Lincolnshire County Council — 2024
- Case reference
- 6009381/2024
- Decision date
- 11 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Nicholson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment issued after Lincolnshire County Council failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Adkinson recorded that a determination could properly be made on the claim, or part of it, under the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment states that the claim succeeds. No substantive findings on liability are set out in the extracted text beyond the respondent's failure to respond in time. The hearing listed for 11 December 2024 was cancelled, and directions were to follow.
The judgment does not record any remedy assessment. It states instead that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not specify the underlying cause of action. It records that the respondent failed to present a valid response on time and that the claim succeeds under rule 21, with remedy to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.