Case 6009390/2024 · Employment Tribunal
B Stephenson v DJG Executives Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009390/2024
- Decision date
- 23 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ayre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
B Stephenson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Leeds Employment Tribunal on 23 August 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Ayre determined that the claim, or part of it, could properly be decided under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that DJG Executives Limited had made unauthorised deductions from B Stephenson's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross amount of £815.00.
The judgment also records that the hearing listed for 11 March 2025 was cancelled. No other claims, liability findings, or separate remedy components are set out in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £815.00. The judgment does not split the award between separate heads of loss. | Upheld | — | £815 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £815
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.