Case 6009468/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Junior Purrier v Leaving Care Solutions Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009468/2024
- Decision date
- 15 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Liz Ord
- Venue
- Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Junior Purrier
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims against Leaving Care Solutions Limited concerning unauthorised deductions from wages and unpaid holiday pay. The tribunal heard the case at Croydon by CVP on 15 October 2025 before Employment Judge Liz Ord.
The tribunal found that from 28 January 2024, the pay date for the December 2023 period, until termination of employment on 9 August 2024, there were no unauthorised deductions of wages and the claimant's holiday pay was correctly paid. It dismissed those claims and held that earlier claims were out of time because it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have brought them in time, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear them.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found no unauthorised deductions of wages from 28 January 2024 to termination on 9 August 2024. Claims before that period were out of time and the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear them. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant's holiday pay was correctly paid from 28 January 2024 to termination on 9 August 2024. Claims before that period were out of time and the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear them. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.