Case 6009478/2025 · Employment Tribunal
M Schoeman v Sam Petulengro — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009478/2025
- Decision date
- 9 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M Schoeman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Wales Employment Tribunal on 19 March 2025. The respondent, Sam Petulengro, failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined that the claim could properly be decided under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from M Schoeman’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £823.78 gross. No other claims, findings, or separate remedy components are recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the respondent did not present a valid response on time and that determination was made under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. | Upheld | — | £824 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £824
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.