Case 6009489/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Edwards v I Luv Coffee Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009489/2024
- Decision date
- 12 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Edwards
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. The judgment was made on the papers and was approved by Employment Judge Quill on 5 March 2025, with the decision sent to the parties on 12 March 2025.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. On that claim, the respondent was ordered to pay Mrs D Edwards £4,619.20 gross.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. On that claim, the respondent was ordered to pay £429. The total monetary award recorded in the judgment is £5,048.20.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,619 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £429 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,048
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.