Case 6009573/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Leon Christian v Mr Shaam Randeva — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009573/2025
- Decision date
- 23 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Representation
- Venue
- by video
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Leon Christian
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Wales Employment Tribunal on 19 March 2025 and heard by video on 23 May 2025 before Employment Judge S Moore. The respondent did not attend and had failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. The named respondent employer is Mr Shaam Randeva.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £266.08 gross, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to give the claimant written itemised pay statements as required by section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 between 17 October 2024 and 12 November 2024.
The tribunal further found that at the start of proceedings the respondent was in breach of the duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars. Finding no exceptional circumstances making it unjust or inequitable, and that an award of four weeks' gross pay was not just and equitable, the tribunal made an award equal to two weeks' gross pay (£228.80) under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. The total sum payable is £494.88.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages; £266.08 gross awarded, with the claimant responsible for tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £266 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars; award of two weeks' gross pay (£228.80) made under section 38 Employment Act 2002. Tribunal also recorded a failure to provide written itemised pay statements under section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 (17 October 2024 to 12 November 2024) but no separate monetary award is attributed to that finding in the judgment text. | Upheld | — | £229 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £495
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
- section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.