Case 6009577/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Boardman v Muzo Clinic — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009577/2025
- Decision date
- 19 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Boardman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs S Boardman brought an uncontested claim against Muzo Clinic. Employment Judge Jones heard the matter at East London Hearing Centre on 18 August 2025 and gave judgment orally at the hearing, with the written record dated 19 August 2025. No liability dispute was recorded in the judgment, and the tribunal dealt only with the monetary claims described in the decision.
The tribunal held that the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was well-founded. It awarded the claimant £9,250, calculated as £37,000/12 x 3 on the basis of gross pay, because the tribunal said this reflected the likelihood that the amount would be taxed as Post Employment Notice Pay.
The tribunal also held that the complaint in respect of holiday pay was well-founded. It found that the respondent had made an authorised deduction from wages by failing to pay for holidays accrued but untaken when employment ended, and the award also included holiday pay accrued during the notice period. The amount awarded for holiday pay was £770.83, and the tribunal noted that the claimant was responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on those sums.
The judgment records a total payable of £10,020.83, made up of the notice pay award of £9,250 and the holiday pay award of £770.83. No other remedies were awarded or discussed in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay was found well-founded. The tribunal awarded £9,250, calculated as £37,000/12 x 3 using gross pay because the claimant was likely to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £9,250 |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay complaint was well-founded. The tribunal found an authorised deduction from wages because the respondent did not pay for holidays accrued but untaken when employment ended, including holiday pay accrued during the notice period. | Upheld | — | £771 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,021
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.