Case 6009685/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Emma Turner v Wemms Education Unlimited Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009685/2024
- Decision date
- 10 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sekhon Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Emma Turner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that Ms Emma Turner was automatically unfairly constructively dismissed for having made protected disclosures. Her complaint was well founded and succeeded.
The Tribunal also found that Ms Turner was subjected to detriment for having made protected disclosures, and that whistleblowing complaint succeeded. The judgment did not record a remedy or monetary award, and no written reasons were provided because reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal described the complaint as automatically unfair constructive dismissal for having made protected disclosures. | Upheld | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The claimant's complaint of being subjected to detriment for having made protected disclosures was well founded. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.