Case 6009769/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Haynes v Elev8 Investments Manchester Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6009769/2025
- Decision date
- 19 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Haynes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Elev8 Investments Manchester Limited unlawfully deducted £1,004.80 from Mrs J Haynes's January 2025 pay. All her other claims of unlawful deduction from wages were dismissed as not well founded. Her claim of constructive unfair dismissal was also dismissed as not well founded; the written judgment records that summary reasons were given at the hearing and does not set out the underlying factual reasoning.
By consent, the parties agreed that Mrs Haynes was owed £493.73 in outstanding holiday pay. The judgment records that the respondent had sent a cheque which Mrs Haynes said she did not receive, and directed the respondent to stop that cheque to avoid double recovery and make payment as ordered. The tribunal also found that Mrs Haynes did not have written terms and conditions complying with s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996 and awarded two weeks' pay under s.38 Employment Act 2002, calculated at £183.04 per week and totalling £366.08. The total amount ordered was £1,864.61.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unlawful deduction was from the claimant's January 2025 pay. | Upheld | — | £1,005 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | All other unlawful-deduction-from-wages claims were dismissed as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | By consent, the parties agreed that this outstanding holiday pay was owed. The respondent was to stop the previously issued cheque and make payment as directed. | Settled | — | £494 |
| Other | Award of two weeks' pay under s.38 Employment Act 2002 because the claimant did not have written terms and conditions complying with s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £366 |
| Constructive dismissal | The constructive unfair dismissal claim was dismissed as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,865
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.