Case 6009829/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Sharp v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009829/2025
- Decision date
- 2 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Buzzard
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr J Sharp
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland, sitting in Glasgow via CVP on 17 September 2025 before Employment Judge N Buzzard, dismissed the claimant's claims under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024. The reason given was that Mr J Sharp failed to attend the hearing and was not represented.
The judgment records that attempts were made to contact the claimant without success. It also states that there had been no contact from the claimant to the tribunal since 2 June 2025, which was the date of his last communication in connection with an earlier postponement and relisting of the hearing.
That earlier postponement and relisting had been at the claimant's request and was arranged to suit the stated availability of both parties. No substantive merits findings were made and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the underlying claim type(s); it states only that the claimant's claims were dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant failed to attend or be represented. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.