Case 6009867/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Aimee Westhead v Fairfax Multi Academy Trust RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009867/2024
- Decision date
- 30 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gidney Appearances
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Aimee Westhead
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a record of a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Gidney on 30 January 2025 in the case of Aimee Westhead v Fairfax Multi Academy Trust. The parties' solicitors were listed as not attending, and the hearing was by CVP audio only.
By consent, the tribunal ordered that the Case Management Hearing listed for 11.30am on 30 January 2025 be postponed. The Case Management Hearing was relisted for 90 minutes at 10.00am on 21 February 2025.
The written record states that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The document does not determine any substantive employment claim or record any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This judgment records only a preliminary case management outcome by consent. It postpones the Case Management Hearing listed for 30 January 2025 and relists it for 21 February 2025. No substantive claim was adjudicated in this record. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.