Case 6009898/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S v O’Loughlin LA’s Community Care Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009898/2025
- Decision date
- 4 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Ms S O’Loughlin’s complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was well-founded in respect of wages earned in January 2025 and February 2025. The judgment records awards of £700 for January and £379.46 for February, making a total of £1,079.46 payable by LA’s Community Care Ltd.
The tribunal also found that the complaint for failure to pay holiday accrued but untaken on termination of employment was well-founded. It ordered the respondent to pay £574.92 in respect of that claim. The judgment records no other claims, no separate liability reasoning beyond the findings stated, and no additional remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint well-founded in respect of wages earned in January 2025 (£700) and February 2025 (£379.46). | Upheld | — | £1,079 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the complaint well-founded for holiday accrued but untaken on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £575 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,654
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.