Case 6010052/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Alana Anderson-Krooder v Think Big Global Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6010052/2025
- Decision date
- 23 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Alana Anderson-Krooder
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented a claim for a statutory redundancy payment to the Manchester Employment Tribunal on 23 March 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response in time. Although the claim was submitted outside the time limit in section 164(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Employment Judge found that the claimant had provided sufficient information to demonstrate that it would be just and equitable for her to receive a redundancy payment in accordance with sections 164(2) and 164(3), and determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £1,087.50, calculated as one week's pay for each of two full years worked (2 x £543.60). The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £1,087.50 in total.
A standard notice was attached regarding interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, identifying 16 December 2025 as the relevant decision day, 17 December 2025 as the calculation day, and 8% per annum as the stipulated rate of interest; no interest was awarded as part of the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment calculated as 1 week's pay for each full year worked (2 x £543.60 = £1,087.50). Respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Claim presented outside the s164(1) ERA time limit but tribunal found it just and equitable under s164(2) and (3) to award the payment. Figure rounded from £1,087.50. | Upheld | — | £1,088 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,088
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,088
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.164(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.164(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.164(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.