Case 6010146/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Williamson v Veolia — 2024
- Case reference
- 6010146/2024
- Decision date
- 18 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Singh Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Williamson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the claimant's claim for breach of contract/unlawful deduction from wages in respect of the failure to allow him the right to an appeal process was well founded. It awarded the claimant GBP 1,090.00, described as two weeks' net pay for that claim.
The Tribunal also found that the claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim concerning the night shift premium for 18 April 2024 was well founded and awarded GBP 43.93 for that claim. The claimant's other unlawful deduction from wages claims relating to other night shift payments were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as a claim for breach of contract/unlawful deduction from wages in respect of the failure to allow the claimant the right to an appeal process. | Upheld | — | £1,090 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | This claim concerned the night shift premium for 18 April 2024. | Upheld | — | £44 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismissed the claimant's other unlawful deduction from wages claims relating to other night shift payments. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,134
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.