Case 6010150/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Michael Barnard v Peninsula Business Services Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6010150/2025
- Decision date
- 10 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lumby REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Michael Barnard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningSitting at Croydon by CVP on 10 September 2025, Employment Judge Lumby heard the complaint against Peninsula Business Services Limited. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr E McFarlane (solicitor).
The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded. The respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages between 1 January 2023 and 31 December 2024, totalling £4,978.53 in 2023 and £5,531.68 in 2024. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the combined gross sum of £10,510.21, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages between 1 January 2023 and 31 December 2024. The 2023 deduction was £4,978.53 and the 2024 deduction was £5,531.68; both elements were classified by the tribunal as unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £10,510 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,510
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.