Case 6010203/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Ridgway v Ms Victoria Stack — 2025
- Case reference
- 6010203/2024
- Decision date
- 14 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Macey Judgment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Ridgway
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss C Ridgway's claim against Ms Victoria Stack. The reasons state that, by a letter dated 10 February 2025, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for non-attendance at the final hearing on 6 February 2025 at 10:00 a.m.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal concluded that the claim had not been actively pursued and ordered that it be struck out. No substantive liability findings or remedy award were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type; it only states that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued after the claimant did not attend the final hearing on 6 February 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.