Case 6010333/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Laura Martinez v The Regent Pub Company Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6010333/2025
- Decision date
- 19 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rao REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Laura Martinez
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Laura Martinez brought complaints against The Regent Pub Company Limited for notice pay, unauthorised deductions from wages, and holiday pay. Employment Judge Rao heard the case at London East Hearing Centre by CVP on 18 August 2025 and gave oral reasons at the hearing. The notice pay complaint was found not well-founded and was dismissed.
The tribunal upheld the wages complaint. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction of £300 from the claimant's wages in respect of bonuses owed for the period October 2024 to December 2024. The tribunal also ordered £150 to compensate the claimant for financial loss attributable to that deduction, giving a total of £450 on that claim.
The holiday pay complaint was well-founded by consent. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction of £135.38 by failing to pay holiday accrued but not taken when the claimant's employment ended. The total judgment sum due was £585.38, made up of £450 for wages and compensation and £135.38 for holiday pay. No written reasons were provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay complaint was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction of £300 in respect of bonuses owed for October 2024 to December 2024 and added £150 to compensate for financial loss. | Upheld | — | £450 |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay complaint was recorded as well-founded by consent; the respondent had failed to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when employment ended. | Upheld | — | £135 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £585
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £150
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.