Case 6010427/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Shakespeare v Compass Group — 2026
- Case reference
- 6010427/2025
- Decision date
- 19 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Shakespeare
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claims after the Claimant failed to attend both the current hearing and the previous hearing. The judgment records that nothing had been heard from the Claimant since July of the previous year.
The Tribunal also recorded that the Claimant had failed to provide disability information ordered by the Tribunal and that attempts to contact her had been unsuccessful. The claims were struck out for non-attendance under rule 47 and for failing to actively pursue the claims under rule 38.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The short judgment states that the claims are struck out but does not itemise the individual claims; this claim type is taken from the listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment refers to disability information ordered by the Tribunal and states that the claims are struck out, but it does not separately describe the discrimination claim. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The short judgment states that the claims are struck out but does not itemise the individual claims; this claim type is taken from the listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 47
- rule 38
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.