Case 6010429/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Nevins v Hook Swim School and Aqua Centre Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6010429/2024
- Decision date
- 31 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Nevins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 02 September 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages for July 2024 (£659.50) and August 2024 (£262.50). The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £922.00 gross in total, with the claimant to account to HMRC for any sums owed in respect of the payment. The hearing listed for 05 March 2025 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 determination after respondent failed to present a valid response in time. Unauthorised deductions of £659.50 (July 2024) and £262.50 (August 2024) totalling £922.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £922 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £922
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.