Case 6010436/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Okosun Erick Eichie v Tilda Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6010436/2024
- Decision date
- 17 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade Members
- Venue
- London East Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Ms P Alford, Ms J Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Okosun Erick Eichie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat on 14, 15, 16 and 17 October 2025 at London East Hearing Centre before Employment Judge B Beyzade, with members Ms P Alford and Ms J Clark. The claimant, Mr Okosun Erick Eichie, represented himself and the respondent was represented by counsel.
In its unanimous judgment, the tribunal found that the claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded and dismissed it. It also found that the claimant’s complaint of direct race discrimination was not well founded and dismissed it.
The written record does not set out the tribunal’s detailed oral reasons, stating only that reasons were given orally at the hearing. It also records that no written reasons will be provided unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records a complaint of direct race discrimination. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.