Case 6010472/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Chowdhury v Castlefield Hospitality Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6010472/2025
- Decision date
- 31 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Chowdhury
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was given the opportunity to object to the Tribunal's proposal dated 31 July 2025 to strike out the claim. The judgment records that the claimant made no representations.
All complaints were struck out under Employment Tribunal Rules 38(1)(c) and (d). The stated reasons were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 9 April 2025 and that the complaints had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that all complaints were struck out under Employment Tribunal Rules 38(1)(c) and (d) because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 9 April 2025 and the complaints had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that all complaints were struck out under Employment Tribunal Rules 38(1)(c) and (d) because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 9 April 2025 and the complaints had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rules 38(1)(c) and (d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.