Case 6010507/2024 · Employment Tribunal
M Barr v The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue & Customs — 2025
- Case reference
- 6010507/2024
- Decision date
- 23 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Newburn Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M Barr
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningM Barr brought a claim against The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs under section 80H(1)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, alleging a breach of the flexible working provisions. The hearing took place at Newcastle CFCTC on 23 October 2025 before Employment Judge Newburn, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.
The tribunal’s judgment was brief and recorded only that the flexible working claim was not well founded. On that basis, the claim was dismissed. No written reasons were provided in the record supplied, and no separate findings of fact, legal analysis, or remedy assessment are set out in the judgment text.
No monetary award was made, and the judgment does not record any other claims or any additional relief.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flexible working | Claim brought under Employment Rights Act 1996, section 80H(1)(a), alleging a breach of the flexible working provisions. The tribunal held it was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.