Case 6010520/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Yvonne Rosemary Pilipenko v Temporary Kitchens Europe Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6010520/2025
- Decision date
- 18 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Abbott Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Yvonne Rosemary Pilipenko
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Yvonne Rosemary Pilipenko's claim against Temporary Kitchens Europe Limited. It had written to the claimant on 13 April 2026 warning that it was considering strike-out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because Tribunal orders had not been complied with and the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not respond with an explanation or request a hearing.
Employment Judge Abbott was satisfied that the Rule 38 grounds applied and that strike-out accorded with the overriding objective in Rule 3. No active steps had been taken concerning disclosure and evidence, and with the final hearing a little over one month away, there was insufficient time to prepare the case for a fair hearing. The claim was struck out, the hearing listed for 30–31 July 2026 was cancelled, and no monetary remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole and did not separately identify or adjudicate the pleaded causes of action; this claim type is taken from the listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole and did not separately identify or adjudicate the pleaded causes of action; this claim type is taken from the listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole and did not separately identify or adjudicate the pleaded causes of action; this claim type is taken from the listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.