Case 6010536/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Pesci v New Inn Barwick Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6010536/2025
- Decision date
- 17 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Edwards Representation
Parties
2 namedMs A Pesci
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge S Edwards heard this case in the respondent's absence. The complaint of automatic unfair dismissal for asserting a statutory right under s.104 Employment Rights Act 1996 was upheld, with a compensatory award of £2,924.81. Complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages (£507.16), breach of contract in relation to notice pay, holiday pay under reg 16(1) Working Time Regulations 1998 (£800.80) and failure to provide itemised pay statements under s.8 ERA were all upheld. The respondent was also in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars; the tribunal made a four weeks' gross pay award of £1,671.32 under s.38 Employment Act 2002. A 10% ACAS uplift of £343.20 was applied to the compensatory award and unlawful deductions award under s.207A TULRCA. Total sum payable £6,247.29.
Claims and outcomes
10 claims adjudicated| Claim type | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Upheld | — | £2,925 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld | — | £507 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Upheld | — | £801 |
| Other | Upheld | — | £1,671 |
| Unfair dismissal | Upheld | — | £2,925 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld | — | £507 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Upheld | — | £801 |
| Other | Upheld | — | £1,671 |
Legal tests applied
6 referencesRemedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,247
- Compensatory award
- £2,925
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.