Case 6010538/2025 · Employment Tribunal

R Dunn v Downey’s Seafood Limited — 2025

Case reference: 6010538/2025
Decision date: 12 June 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Newburn Appearances
Venue: Newcastle CFCTC

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

R Dunn

Respondent

Downey’s Seafood Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The hearing took place at Newcastle CFCTC on 12 June 2025 before Employment Judge Newburn. Neither party attended, and the tribunal continued in their absence under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024. The written record states that the claimant's claims were struck out.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The written judgment does not identify this claim separately, but the case listing categories supplied with the record included breach of contract. The tribunal struck out the claimant's claims because they had not been actively pursued.	Struck out	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The written judgment does not identify this claim separately, but the case listing categories supplied with the record included unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal struck out the claimant's claims because they had not been actively pursued.	Struck out	—	—
Working time regulations	The written judgment does not identify this claim separately, but the case listing categories supplied with the record included working time. The tribunal struck out the claimant's claims because they had not been actively pursued.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.