Case 6010621/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Greg Turner v Flying Goose Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6010621/2024
- Decision date
- 9 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gordon Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Greg Turner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response to the claim. Employment Judge Gordon Walker determined the claims under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024 on the basis of information the claimant provided in the claim form and by correspondence to the Tribunal.
The claim for unauthorised deductions from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was found to be well founded. The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant one week's unpaid wages of £14,691 gross and accrued but untaken holiday pay of £349.26 gross, both payable within 14 days. The gross holiday pay figure was calculated from a net figure of £250.12 using the claimant's net and gross weekly wage figures.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | One week's unpaid wages awarded gross under Employment Rights Act 1996 section 13. | Upheld | — | £14,691 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but untaken holiday pay awarded gross (£349.26 in judgment, rounded to nearest GBP). | Upheld | — | £349 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,040
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Rights Act 1996 section 13
- rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.