Case 6010668/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Daniel Crook v ICTV Sales and Services Ltd (In Voluntary Members’/Creditors’ Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6010668/2024
- Decision date
- 28 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Richardson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Daniel Crook
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Southampton by CVP on 16 and 17 June 2025 before Employment Judge Richardson, found that Mr Daniel Crook’s complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded. The respondent, ICTV Sales and Services Ltd (in voluntary members’/creditors’ liquidation), did not attend. The judgment records that the claimant was unfairly dismissed.
On remedy, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £1,875, calculated as 1.5 times the weekly salary of £625 for two years. It also awarded a compensatory element covering 22 weeks from 13 June 2024 to 10 November 2024 at net pay of £476.36, producing £10,479.92 before adjustments. The tribunal deducted income generated during the 22-week period of £2,860.20 and applied a 25% uplift because the respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015.
After those adjustments, the tribunal recorded a total compensatory award of £9,524.65 and added £500 for loss of statutory rights, producing a total award of £11,899.65. The judgment also states that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 do not apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal complaint well-founded. The award included a basic award of £1,875, a compensatory award reduced and uplifted as set out in the judgment, and £500 for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £11,900 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,900
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,875
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £9,525
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015
- s.207A Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.