Case 6010670/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Kamalska v TOC Property Servicing Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6010670/2024
- Decision date
- 4 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Kamalska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Southampton hearing on 24 September 2025, Employment Judge Gray recorded that Mrs M Kamalska succeeded in her complaints of direct race discrimination and unfair dismissal. The Respondent did not attend and was not represented. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons are included in the extracted judgment.
The tribunal awarded a basic award of £7,837.56, calculated in the judgment as 9 x 1.5 x £580.56. It also awarded a compensatory award of £6,986.65, calculated as 3 x £1,995.55 plus £1,000, and injury to feelings of £8,000. The judgment states that these sums are to be paid by the Respondent to the Claimant.
The written record does not set out the tribunal's reasoning in writing and does not split the monetary award between the race discrimination and unfair dismissal complaints. On the face of the record, the only findings available are that both complaints succeeded and the stated awards were made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The written record describes this as a complaint of direct race discrimination. The judgment states the complaint succeeded, but the document does not apportion any part of the monetary award to this claim. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal complaint succeeded. The written record does not apportion the award between this claim and the discrimination claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £22,824
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £7,838
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £6,987
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.