Case 6010695/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Ann Johnston v The Zoological Society of Wales (The Welsh Mountain Zoo) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6010695/2025
- Decision date
- 18 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Ann Johnston
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint because it was not brought within three months of the effective date of termination of employment. The tribunal found that it had been reasonably practicable for the complaint to have been brought within that period.
The tribunal also dismissed the claimant's sex discrimination complaints because they were not brought within three months of the latest act to which the complaints related. The tribunal found that it was not just and equitable to extend time. No remedy was awarded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint was dismissed because it was not brought within three months of the effective date of termination, and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to have brought it within that period. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The sex discrimination complaints were dismissed because they were not brought within three months of the latest act complained of, and the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.