Case 6010745/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Fulthorpe v BH Appliance Solutions and Repairs Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6010745/2024
- Decision date
- 9 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Fulthorpe
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the respondent’s title to BH Appliance Solutions and Repairs Limited and heard the case by CVP on 9 December 2024 before Employment Judge Arullendran. The respondent did not attend. The claimant appeared in person.
The sole complaint determined was unauthorised deduction from wages. The tribunal found that the complaint was well-founded and that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages in the period 1 July 2024 to 31 August 2024.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £5,000, described in the judgment as the gross sum deducted. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any tax or national insurance due on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages well-founded and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted for the period 1 July 2024 to 31 August 2024. | Upheld | — | £5,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.