Case 6010874/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Louise Mantle v 2D CNC Machinery Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6010874/2024
- Decision date
- 4 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Siddique Representation
- Venue
- Nottingham via Cloud Video Platform
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Louise Mantle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Nottingham via the Cloud Video Platform on 11 November 2025 before Employment Judge M Siddique. The claimant, Louise Mantle, appeared in person and the respondent did not appear. The tribunal gave oral judgment and later issued the written record.
The tribunal found that the claimant’s claim for redundancy pay was well founded and ordered 2D CNC Machinery Ltd to pay £3,602.07. It also upheld the complaint about holiday pay, finding the respondent had been in breach of contract by failing to pay for holidays accrued but untaken at the date employment ended. For that claim, the tribunal ordered payment of £926.98 as damages, representing the gross value of the amount due to the claimant.
The tribunal dismissed the complaint for unauthorised deductions from wages under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996, finding it was not well founded. It also dismissed the breach of contract complaint relating to notice pay. The total sum ordered to be paid was £4,529.05.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,602 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal treated this as a breach of contract claim for holidays accrued but untaken at the date employment terminated, and awarded the gross amount due to the claimant. | Upheld | — | £927 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint under Part II Employment Rights Act 1996 was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was not well founded and failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,529
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.