Keith Angel v Brake Bros Limited — 2025

Case reference: 6010877/2024
Decision date: 30 September 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Liz Ord
Venue: Croydon

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Keith Angel

Respondent

Brake Bros Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that the complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and succeeded. It also recorded that there would be a 25% reduction in the basic award and compensatory award due to blameworthy conduct which caused or contributed to the dismissal.

The tribunal further recorded that the complaint of wrongful dismissal was well-founded and succeeded. The written judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The written judgment states that the unfair dismissal complaint is well-founded and succeeds, with a 25% reduction in the basic and compensatory awards for blameworthy conduct causing or contributing to dismissal. No monetary figures are provided.	Upheld	—	—
Wrongful dismissal	The written judgment states that the wrongful dismissal complaint is well-founded and succeeds. No monetary figures or further reasons are provided in the written record.	Upheld	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.