Case 6010878/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Hazel Jordan v LRG Employees Ltd v — 2025
- Case reference
- 6010878/2024
- Decision date
- 23 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Read
- Venue
- Reading Tribunal
- Panel members
- Ms B Osborne, Mr A Kapur
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Hazel Jordan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningHazel Jordan’s complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability was heard at Reading Tribunal on 28-29 May 2025 before Employment Judge Read, Ms B Osborne and Mr A Kapur. The written judgment records that the complaint was not well-founded and was dismissed.
The decision note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made at the hearing or is made in writing within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties. No monetary award is recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written record states that the complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability was not well-founded and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; no written reasons are included in this record. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.