Case 6010881/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Szynal v Rokt Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6010881/2025
- Decision date
- 6 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tegerdine Representation
- Venue
- Sheffield
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Szynal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the claimant's claim for breach of contract was well founded. The claimant's employment with ROKT Ltd terminated on 13 January 2025, and although he was contractually entitled to three months' notice pay, he was given only one month's notice.
The Tribunal awarded the claimant the gross sum of £9,441.67 as damages for breach of contract, calculated as the balance of two months' notice pay (£9,166.67) together with two months' employer's pension contributions (£275.00). The respondent was ordered to pay the sum on or before 20 February 2026.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for breach of contract well founded; claimant awarded gross sum of £9,441.67 as damages, comprising two months' notice pay (£9,166.67) and two months' employer's pension contributions (£275.00). | Upheld | — | £9,442 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,442
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.