Mrs C Wallace v Coleman Training Ltd — 2024

Case reference: 6010932/2024
Decision date: 7 November 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Buzzard Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs C Wallace

Respondent

Coleman Training Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal considered a claim by Mrs C Wallace against Coleman Training Ltd. By letter dated 23 September 2024, it gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because the claim appeared to show that she had been employed for less than two years.

The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any determination of the merits of the underlying claim.

The hearing fixed for 31 July 2025 was cancelled and would not take place.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The Tribunal struck out the claim after giving the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 23 September 2024 to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out because the claim appeared to show that she had been employed for less than two years. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.