Case 6010949/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Pearce v Forte Entertainment Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 6010949/2024
- Decision date
- 10 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge French Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Pearce
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Watford Employment Tribunals on 10 September 2024. The respondent did not present a valid response in time, and the Employment Judge determined that the claim could properly be decided under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,500 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,034.48.
The judgment records a total sum payable to the claimant of £2,534.48. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge French on 11 December 2024 and sent to the parties on 12 March 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 determination following the respondent's failure to present a valid response on time. Award stated as £1,500 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,500 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 determination; tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,034 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,534
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.