Case 6010981/2025 · Employment Tribunal
PD Baderinwa v AGS Support Facilities Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6010981/2025
- Decision date
- 1 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
PD Baderinwa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that, by letter dated 19 May 2025, it had given the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out because it had been presented more than four months out of time. The claimant did not reply.
On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim for the reasons set out in the 19 May 2025 letter. The judgment does not set out any merits findings on the underlying complaint.
The respondent also informed the Tribunal that there was already another claim before the Tribunal about the same issues, reference 2306877/24. The judgment notes, for the avoidance of doubt, that the race discrimination aspect of that other claim was continuing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim because it was submitted over four months out of time and the claimant did not reply to the Tribunal's letter dated 19 May 2025 inviting representations. The judgment does not identify the pleaded causes of action; the respondent said there was already a claim before the tribunal about the same issues (2306877/24), and that the race discrimination aspect of that other claim was continuing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.