Case 6011016/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Z Zorokong v The Ministry of Defence Heard via Cloud Video Platform (London Central) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6011016/2025
- Decision date
- 16 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Z Zorokong
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an interim relief application heard by Employment Judge Davidson on 15 May 2025. The claimant was Ms Z Zorokong and the respondent was the Ministry of Defence. The tribunal considered whether it was likely that, on determining the underlying complaint, it would find that the reason or principal reason for the claimant's dismissal was the reason specified in s103A ERA 1996.
The tribunal concluded that it was not likely to reach that finding. On that basis, interim relief was held not to be appropriate in this case. The judgment does not record any award of compensation or any split of remedies, because the application was refused at this preliminary stage.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Application for interim relief under s103A ERA 1996. The tribunal held it was not likely that, on determining the complaint, it would find the reason or principal reason for dismissal was that specified in s103A. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s103A ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.