Case 6011059/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Leila Campos de Oliveira v Shard Viewing Gallery Management Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6011059/2024
- Decision date
- 4 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Wilson Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Leila Campos de Oliveira
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the private video hearing in London South on 4 November 2025, Employment Judge N Wilson heard from the respondent, Shard Viewing Gallery Management Limited, represented by Callum Peel. Miss Leila Campos de Oliveira did not attend.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 because she failed to attend the hearing. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on liability or remedy. It records that the decision was explained orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Claim type inferred from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself only records that the claimant's claims were dismissed under Rule 47 for failing to attend a hearing. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | Claim type inferred from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself only records that the claimant's claims were dismissed under Rule 47 for failing to attend a hearing. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.