Case 6011065/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Concannon v Dendro Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6011065/2025
- Decision date
- 8 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hook REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- London East
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Concannon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr J Concannon, appeared in person. The respondent, Dendro Ltd, did not attend and was not represented at the hearing on 8 September 2025 before Employment Judge Hook at London East Employment Tribunal by video. The tribunal recorded that the claimant’s claims for unpaid holiday pay, notice pay, redundancy payment and failure to pay wages were well founded.
The judgment awarded the claimant separate sums of £2,076 for holiday pay, £3,750 for notice pay, £2,800 for redundancy pay and £3,750 for unpaid wages. The total award was £12,376.
The written record does not set out separate reasons beyond the statement that the claims were well founded, and no further legal analysis or findings of fact are included in the extracted judgment text. The tribunal’s order was simply that the respondent must pay the claimant £12,376.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,076 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as notice pay. | Upheld | — | £3,750 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,800 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £3,750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,376
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.