Case 6011112/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Andre dos Santos Rosa Graca v Liberum Independent Medical Education Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6011112/2024
- Decision date
- 31 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Snelson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Andre dos Santos Rosa Graca
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3. Employment Judge Snelson therefore dealt with the case under rule 21 on the papers, having considered the ET1 and concluding that a determination could properly be made without a hearing. The hearing listed for 23 December 2024 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant a statutory redundancy payment of £2,800, in breach of section 135 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay an ex gratia payment forming part of the redundancy package in the sum of £1,275. The respondent was ordered to pay £4,075 in total, being the sum of those two amounts.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay a statutory redundancy payment, citing section 135 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £2,800 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay an ex gratia payment as part of the redundancy package; the judgment does not state a separate statutory basis for this sum. | Upheld | — | £1,275 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,075
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21
- s.135 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.