Case 6011447/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Mather v Cork Crane Hire Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6011447/2025
- Decision date
- 5 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross.
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Mather
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester on 5 August 2025 before Employment Judge KM Ross. Neither the claimant, Mr P Mather, nor the respondent, Cork Crane Hire Ltd, attended.
The judgment records that the claimant's claim for breach of contract and/or unlawful deductions from wages was dismissed because the claimant did not attend, pursuant to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024. The tribunal did not make findings on the merits of the underlying employment dispute.
No remedy was awarded and no monetary figure is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed upon the claimant's non-attendance pursuant to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024; no merits determination recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to the claim as 'breach of contract and/or unlawful deductions from wages' and dismisses it upon the claimant's non-attendance under Rule 47; no separate merits finding is recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.