In Person For the v Respondent — 2025

Case reference: 6011487/2024
Decision date: 11 July 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Harding Approved

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

In Person For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At a preliminary hearing converted under Rule 48 from a final hearing, the tribunal considered a breach of contract claim arising from an enhanced redundancy payment under Regulation 6 of the Local Government (Early Termination of Employment) (Discretionary Compensation) (England and Wales) Regulations 2006 and associated policies. The tribunal stated that, on the assumption that the enhanced redundancy payment was contractual, it was not ultra vires.

The tribunal then held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 because the claim was not arising or outstanding on termination of employment. The claim was therefore dismissed. No monetary award was made.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	Preliminary hearing. The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 because the claim was not arising or outstanding on termination of employment.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.