Case 6011542/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Rahim Abdur v Bagitali Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6011542/2024
- Decision date
- 2 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Povey Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Rahim Abdur
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claimant brought a claim of unfair dismissal contrary to section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 against Bagitali Limited.
The Tribunal found that the unfair dismissal claim was not presented before the end of the three-month period beginning with the effective date of termination. It also found that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented within that period.
By reason of section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Tribunal held that it could not consider the unfair dismissal claim and struck it out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim because it was not presented within the three-month time limit and it was reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.