Case 6011608/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Sandu Vames v Mr Jonathan Walker — 2025
- Case reference
- 6011608/2024
- Decision date
- 21 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Sandu Vames
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at East London Hearing Centre by Cloud Video Platform on 21 July 2025 before Employment Judge Gardiner. The claimant, Mr Sandu Vames, did not attend and the respondent, Mr Jonathan Walker, also did not attend.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 because of non-attendance. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made at the hearing or a written request is made within 14 days of sending the decision.
The judgment does not set out the substantive nature of the claim(s), any findings on the merits, or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying legal claim(s); it states only that the claimant's claim was dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 for non-attendance. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.